Category:Regional wine

Winecast 15: Anna Katharine Mansfield, Cornell University

One of the most exciting things going on in regional wine is the research and development of new grape species, and especially the work being done with cold hardy grapes. Vitis vinifera, the European wine grape species that includes chardonnay and cabernet sauvignon, doesn't like cold weather.

Hence the effort to propagate cold hardy grapes that can be made into quality wine. Anna Katharine Mansfield, a Cornell University enologist, has been a key researcher in the development of several of these grapes. One of them is frontenac, which produces a fruity red wine that has been successfully grown in regions as far north as Minnesota.

In the podcast, we talk about developing new grape varieties, how and why it's done, and why it's so important. This is not my best recording — we were in a large building where we judged the International Eastern Wine Competition. There were a lot of echoes, and you'll need to keep the sound turned up. The podcast is 7.4 megabytes and lasts about 8 minutes. You can download or stream it here.

, , ,

Book review: Todd Kliman’s The Wild Vine

“The Wild Vine” is an important book, and not just because author Todd Kliman is writing about regional wine and the norton grape, two of my favorites. It’s an important book because Kliman offers some much-needed insight into the history of American wine. It’s a perspective that says, “Look, pay attention. Long before Robert Parker and scores and California, there was a U.S. wine industry. And if a few things had happened differently. …”

Disclaimers first: I know Kliman, and consider him a friend. But that in no way changes my opinion of the quality of the work. A few thoughts about The Wild Vine:

Kliman says this isn’t a book about wine as much as it is a book about history and the people involved and larger truths about our culture and how we became who we are. And he is right. But it reminded me of The Boys of Summer, which was about a lot more than baseball, yet is one of the best books ever written about baseball.

So Kliman presents quite possibly the best explanation I have ever read about terroir and what it means and why it is so difficult to understand: “The word refers to the almost mystical combination of soil and air that, in the impassioned view of the French, for whom it is a kind of referendum on the national character, is imparted to every bottle of wine.”

Kliman’s depiction of the regional wine business and the people who are in it, both in their strengths and weaknesses, is uncanny. And his description of his first bottle of norton is not unlike what happens to most of us when we taste it for the first time, and why we keep coming back to this odd and strange wine for reasons we can’t quite figure out: “It was dark, it was earthy; there was something wild, something alive in the glass. … I had seldom tasted this earthiness in California wines.”

Yet, as Kliman says, there is more to the book than wine. It’s not always easy to see, but it is worth looking for. It’s in his visit to Missouri’s Oak Glenn winery, and the bachelorette party he encounters. It’s in his friendship with Jenni McCloud, who owns Virginia’s Chrysalis Vineyards and makes some of the best nortons in the world. It’s in his fascination with Daniel Norton, the physician turned horticulturist whose amateur fumblings created the grape.

Most of all, The Wild Vine is worth reading. It may not change the way people think about regional wine and norton, but it should make anyone who reads it think about America and wine and why we approach it the way we do.

, , , , , ,

International Eastern Wine Competition, Part II

IMG_1101 This is how well-run the International Eastern Wine Competiton is — it survived the Wine Curmudgeon being placed in a minor role of authority. I had to oversee my judging group on the second day of the three-day event. That meant I had to record the scores for the wines we judged — and do some math in the proicess. I'm still shuddering.

Having said all that, I had a wonderful time and it is one of my favorite competitions to judge. If nothing else, I always get to taste some wonderful New York rieslings that aren't available in Texas. My report is here, and it is updated with results.

And what would the IEWC be without a picture of me in my lab coat (courtesy of my pal Dave McIntyre)?

, ,

International Eastern Wine Competition 2010, Part I

The Wine Curmudgeon is in New York’s Finger Lakes this week to judge one of my favorite events. It’s the International Eastern Wine Competition, run by my pal Richard Leahy of Vineyard & Winery Management magazine. It’s one of my favorites because the wines we judge are so Wine Curmudgeonly — mostly regional wines, and many made with grapes that aren’t chardonnay, cabernet sauvignon, or merlot.

Plus I get to wear a lab coat and look like I know what I’m doing. Look for my report next week, plus the annual picture of me in my lab coat. This year, I haven’t spilled nearly as much red wine on it as I did last year.

Wine of the week: McPherson Cellars Sangiovese 2008

It’s easy to champion regional wine when there are regional winemakers like Kim McPherson, whose self-named winery in Lubbock produces some of the best wines in Texas. Best yet, McPherson’s wines are reasonably priced; he understands that you can’t ask consumers to pay $25 for a bottle of wine for no other reason than it’s a regional wine.

McPherson has three great strengths as a winemaker. First, he has never once said that Texas should be Napa, which is something the Wine Curmudgeon hears all too often from regional winemakers. Second, because he understands that Texas isn’t Napa, he makes wine with grapes that are suited to the hot, dry climate. That means Spanish, Italian and southern French varietals — viognier instead of chardonnay and sangiovese instead of merlot (and if I could only get him to make chenin blanc, the world would be that much closer to perfection). Third, he makes wines that are enjoyable, a concept that too many winemakers (are you listening, California?) don’t understand.

The sangiovese (about $16, purchased) is one of the best examples of what regional wine should be. It tastes like sangiovese, with cherry fruit, balanced acid, and soft tannins. But it is not Chianti, the sangiovese from Tuscany, and it is not sangiovese from California. McPherson takes what Texas gives him instead of forcing the wine to taste like what he thinks it should taste like.

Serve this with anything with red sauce, roasted chicken, or even barbecue. Availability outside of Texas may be limited.

, , , , ,

Paul Bonarrigo has the courage of his clothing convictions

Paul Bonarrigo of Texas' Messina Hof Winery is famous for his appearance — call it Winemaker Red. If Paul is at an event, he's probably wearing his red cap and his red suit. Paul also favors purple and blue, and there is even some sort of white outfit with white pants, white vest, and white sport coat decorated with black illustrations. His look is even more distinctive than the Wine Curmudgeon's fedora, and that's saying something.

So imagine my surprise when I was browsing the Texas wine section at Kroger the other day and saw the picture posted to the left. It's called a neck hanger (since it hangs from the neck of a bottle of wine), and wineries do them to highlight a favorable review or to make special offers.

This one was on several Messina Hof labels, describing a charity promotion. My surprise, of course, was not the special offer, but Paul's appearance. Let's be honest — how many Kroger shoppers expect to see something like that when they buy a bottle of wine?

Which, of course, is probably the point. Messina Hof, like other Texas and regional wineries, doesn't have huge multi-national wine marketing budgets. But it does have Paul. So why not use him? Who is ever going to forget that picture?

, ,

DrinkLocalWine.com 2010: The day after

That was fun. Let’s do it again.

DrinkLocalWine.com 2010, which focused on Virginia wine and ended Sunday, taught me two things. First, that there is an incredible enthusiasm for information about regional wine in the state. Second, that social media, regardless of what cranks like I think, is here to stay. These two bits tied into each other during our Twitter Taste-off, which saw an unprecedented amount of information about Virginia wine flood the cyber ether.

We don’t have official statistics on the number of tweets and retweets and various other social media things yet, but I’m told we’re in five figures and working up from there. That means thousands and thousands of people learned about Virginia wine, and they didn’t need the Winetream Media to do it. The wine world is changing, and the Wine Curmudgeon is glad to be here to watch it.

One thing I didn’t learn? That Virginia produces quality wine. I already knew that. Petite manseng, anyone?