No, single-serve plastic glasses of wine did not “disrupt” wine
Remember ZIPZ? It was the next big thing in wine, an oversized plastic glass with one serving that was endorsed by the masters of the universe at Shark Tank about a decade ago.
Don’t remember it? Not to worry. Almost no one else does, either.
Mashed recounts ZIPZ’s sad, not unsurprising history, and it’s well worth reading for those of us who wonder – and lament – that wine has had such difficulty adapting to the 21st century. The ZIPZ glass, for all of its many failings, was a unique way to package wine – call it “disruptive,” if you must.
Yet it never had a chance, and that it didn’t speaks to how the wine business resists change, even when change is exactly what is needed.
Why not a chance?
• First, the wine was lousy. That it would be difficult to find quality wine to put in a plastic, single-serve glass apparently surprised ZIPZ’s creator, who probably had never seen anything quite like the bulk wine market.
• Second, the three-tier system. You just can’t make ZIPZ wine and sell it to Costco, which seemed to be the plan. Rather, it has to go through a wholesaler, and why would a wholesaler want to waste its time on something as funky as lousy single-serve wine in a plastic glass? And where the margins would be so tiny?
•Third, retailers. Most wine in the U.S. is sold in 750 ml bottles, which means store shelves are set up to stock 750 ml bottles. So where do you stack cases of single-serve plastic glasses? This nugget somehow escaped the moneyed geniuses at Shark Tank; call it a lesson in the supply chain they would eventually have to learn.
The irony of all this? That canned wine does all the things that ZIPZ was supposed to do, and does it more efficiently. And that canned wine, for all of its many failings, is the next big thing in wine. Wonder why none of the geniuses saw that?








