
Tom Wark: Some say the Supreme Court only takes an alcohol case every 15 to 20 years. Let’s hope that’s not the case
This month, the Supreme Court dashed the hopes of anyone who wants to buy wine on the Internet when it declined to hear a Michigan case that might have allowed us to buy wine on the Internet. So I asked Tom Wark, who knows more about this stuff than most attorneys, to talk about the chances of three-tier reform to make it easier to buy wine on-line in the wake of the court’s decision.
Wark is the executive director of the National Association of Wine Retailers, a trade group for independent retailers who want to sell wine on the Internet to all 50 states. As such, he is has worked with lawyers and lobbyists to try to figure out a way around the antiquated and obsolete three-tier system.
In this, the podcast is in English, and we hardly speak legalese at all. The topics included:
• Why the Supreme Court declined to hear the Michigan case, and why some attorneys think we’ll have to wait 15 years before we get another chance to overturn the three-tier system.
• Why Wark doesn’t think that all is lost with the Supreme Court.
• Why reforming the three-tier system would make it easier to buy quality cheap wine, and especially imports.
• And that wine drinkers should contact their state legislators to ask them to allow out-of-state retailers to ship into their state.
Click here to download or stream the podcast, which is about 15 minutes long and takes up 10 megabytes. Quality is good to excellent – Zoom still acts up when I least expect it.









This week’s wine news: The wine snobs celebrate the holiday season
This week’s wine news: Wine.com reports 217 percent sales increase, plus restaurants are headed in the opposite direction and another critic ponders the need for toasty and oaky