Quantcast

Tag Archives: wine news

Winebits 392: Wine closures, cava, women winemakers

wine closures

wine closuresBring on the screwcaps: Mike Veseth at the Wine Economist offers one of the best analyses of the state of the wine closures, noting that the number of wineries that used corks, synthetic corks, and screwcaps isn’t as important as the size of the winieres. This is something that the cork people ignore in their quest to convince us that 19th century technology is still relevant. In other words, the next time you see something from a cork producer talking about how many wineries use natural cork, know that about half the wine in the U.S. has a synthetic cork. The post also includes this great quote from Australian wine guru Hugh Johnson: “I am faintly irritated now when I come to open a bottle of wine and find I need a corkscrew.” Who knew a wine guru would sound like the Wine Curmudgeon?

Bring on the cava: Shocking news for the wine business, of course, because this is mostly cheap wine, but nothing that those of us who don’t pay attention already know: Cava sales are soaring, up by 4.6 percent last year. By comparison, overall wine sales were mostly flat in 2014. The top cava brand, black bottle Freixenet, is the country’s best-selling imported sparkling brand as well, even beating all those moscatos.

Update: Bring on the women: Apparently, I’m not the only one who found flaws in this study. I wonder: What’s going on with people who publish studies with serious errors?

Women winemakers, woefully underrepresented in the male-dominated wine business, make the best wine, despite accounting for only about 10 percent of winemakers. That’s the conclusion of a sort of study from Gabriel Froymovich at consultancy Vineyard Financial Associates, who says “I have often lamented the under-representation of women in this business.” This would be huge news and worth its own blog post, save for the methodology, which is why I call it a sort of study. Froymovich equates price with quality, and we know what a swamp that is — and only does so because using scores would be too much work, he says. This not only assumes that higher priced wine is better, which no one has ever demonstrated to be true, but that it doesn’t require skill to make cheap wine. Somehow, I think Jenn Wall at Barefoot would argue that point. Note, too, that the Wine Curmudgeon has advocated for women winemakers for more than a decade, so my problems with the study are not the results, but that better math wasn’t used to get them.

Image courtesy of Wine Anorak, using a Creative Commons license

Winebits 391: Wine snobs edition

winenews

wine snobsBecause, sadly, wine snobs have been dominating the wine news lately:

Defending wine: Alder Yarrow, one of the most respected wine writers in the U.S., writes forcefully about the recent spate of anti-wine sentiment on the Internet, lamenting the fact that so many are so hateful about wine. He seems surprised by the venom, unable to understand why people write things like “Americans who drink wine do so because they think they are living in a BBC adaptation of a Jane Austen novel.” In this, Yarrow doesn’t see the forest for the trees, despite his skill, influence, and popularity. People hate wine because too many wine drinkers and too many people who write about wine want wine to be that way. Remind me to tell the story sometime about the editor who said I couldn’t write for her because wine drinkers weren’t interested in what I wrote about. Or, as a student in my wine class asked me: “Will I be successful in the restaurant industry if all I drink is sweet wine? Won’t they hold it against me?” And I didn’t have an answer for her, other than to say people like me were trying to change that.

You can always count on the Wine Spectator: Matt Kramer, writing about local wine, asks “Should restaurant wine lists feature local wines?” Could it be? Was one of the high priests of the Winestream Media advocating local wine? Would the Wine Curmudgeon have to welcome the Spectator into the regional wine movement? Of course not. This is the Spectator. In 819 words, Kramer comes to this conclusion: “Should restaurant wine lists showcase and champion local wines? Do restaurants have any such obligation? Is it even desirable? I leave it to you to decide.” Which, I suppose, is how you get to be a high priest of the Winestream Media.

Money, money, money: I wonder if Yarrow saw this study, which says rich people are buying wine not to drink, but “as a wealth store – providing a hedge against inflation, protection against low interest rates and currency fluctuations.” How wonderful it must be to be rich, to buy wine instead of gold or real estate. “Wine, Katie Scarlett. Why wine is the only thing in the world worth workin’ for, worth fightin’ for, worth dyin’ for, because it’s the only thing that lasts.” The Wine Curmudgeon, whose lack of business acumen is legendary, has never been able to appreciate this. I buy wine to drink, because drinking wine gives me pleasure. Who knew the rich got as much pleasure from just looking at it?

Winebits 390: Restaurant wine, retailing, consolidation

winenews

Restaurant wineLess and less: The share of wine that consumers buy in restaurants, compared to what they buy in stores, has fallen by some 10 percent since the start of the recession, according to figures compiled by Beverage Information Group. In 2014, restaurants accounted for 42.2 percent of all wine sales as measured in dollars, down from 47 percent in 2008. By itself, this isn’t doesn’t necessarily mean that restaurant wine is becoming increasingly irrelevant, given that the recession was so long and so powerful. But given the recovery in the retail side of the wine business, it’s another indication that consumers, fed up with the poor quality and high prices on so many restaurant wine lists, aren’t buying wine anymore. It also speaks to what might be a significant change in consumer dining habits, that they’re eating at home more often and buying wine when they do.

Honesty is the best policy: Shocking news, but a British on-line retailer says too many of his competitors artificially inflate their prices so they can offer lower “angel” discounts on wines that consumers can’t buy anywhere else, leaving the consumer with overpriced, lower quality wine. It would be better, says the managing director of WineTrust, to price honestly, the way his company does it. This is a not a problem unique to Britain, as anyone who has ever tried to understand U.S. grocery store pricing knows, but it is interesting that a retailer is calling out other companies for the practice. I can’t imagine that ever happening in the U.S., where price confusion is a key part of retailing.

Getting even bigger: This is how crazy consolidation in the wine business is becoming. A buyout specialist is apparently thinking about taking over Diageo, the British  wine, beer, and spirits company, in a deal worth more than $70 billion. To put that number in perspective, 170 countries have a smaller gross domestic product. Diageo, though wine is the smallest part of its business, is still among the top dozen or so biggest U.S. producers, with brands that include Rosenblum, Sterling, and Dom Perignon. There’s substantial doubt whether a deal gets done, not least because it’s so expensive. But that anyone is even considering it points to the mania for consolidation in the world today.

 

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: suv | Thanks to toyota suv, infiniti suv and lexus suv