Tag Archives: inexpensive wine

2016 $10 Hall of Fame coming Jan. 8


2016 $10 Hall of FameWhich means this is your opportunity to nominate a $10 wine for the 2016 $10 Hall of Fame. Leave your suggestion in the comments to this post or click on the link to send me an email. Know that the wine needs to cost around $10 (and I might be a bit more flexible about price this year) in much of the country and can’t be a private label like Two-buck Chuck; complete eligibility rules are here.

This year, we’ll feature $10 wine information much of the first week of January, including the third annual Do-it-yourself New Year’s wine resolutions. And, because so many have requested it, you’ll be able to print the new $10 Hall of Fame — in a PDF — and take the list with you to the wine shop.

This is the ninth annual $10 Hall of Fame, so I’ll have to come up with something terrific to celebrate a decade of great cheap wine in 2017.

Bogle wins 2015 cheap wine poll

cheap wine poll 2015

Bogle wins the cheap wine poll for the second time in three years.

And it wasn’t even close, with Bogle more than doubling second place Falesco Vitiano to win the 2015 cheap wine poll. This is Bogle’s second consecutive victory, and its second in the poll’s three-year history.

That Bogle did so well again speaks to not only the company’s commitment to quality, but to its availability. Bogle combines value with a huge retail presence — as one commenter wrote, “it may be the best wine one can buy in gas stations in Mineola, Texas, as well as Princeton, Maine.” Most cheap wines do only one or the other, and some don’t even do that.

Which, apparently, is the case with Two-buck Chuck. The Trader Joe’s brand has finished last every year, but I guess that it has sold more 600 million cases over the past decade is some consolation to the retailer.

The biggest surprise? That Barefoot did so poorly, finishing seventh after coming in second last year. In addition, given how many people Google sends to the blog to read about Barefoot, that the brand didn’t pick up any of those votes this year makes its performance even more shocking. Barefoot overload, perhaps?

Not surprising? That Yellow Tail and Cupcake finished eighth and ninth. I added them this year not because I thought they would do well, but to include more well-known brands. That they did so poorly speaks to why they sell — the former is cheap, and the latter is cute. Quality doesn’t have much to do with it.

This year’s results are below, and you can find the 2014 and 2013 polls here and here. The 2016 poll will return next year at this time, and I’ll include a couple of suggestions from the comments. And is it time to retire Bogle and let someone else win?
Business Lists on Ranker

The cheap wine poll 2015



cheap wine pollWelcome to the Wine Curmudgeon’s third annual cheap wine poll, which runs today through Dec. 15. I’ll post the results on Dec. 17.

You can vote for the brand you like the most or against a label that you don’t like — just click on the respective buttons next to each entry at the bottom of this post. You can vote here or on the Ranker site, where the poll is hosted (and thanks again to Ranker, the blog’s unofficial polling widget). If you get the blog via RSS or email, click here to vote on the blog or here to vote at Ranker.

Share the poll with your friends and fellow cheap wine drinkers by clicking on any of the social media buttons at the bottom of the poll or at end of the post. The first two polls attracted some 10,000 visitors.

I’ve included 10 producers, adding Cupcake, Yellow Tail, and the Cono Sur Bicicleta brand this year. The brands in the poll cost around $10, they’re generally available (which means you can find them in a retailer in a decent-sized city), and they’re popular enough so that people have heard of them. Falesco Vitiano won in 2013 and Bogle won in 2014.
Business Lists on Ranker

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: suv | Thanks to toyota suv, infiniti suv and lexus suv